absolutwill (August 19, 2008 at 8:15 am)

Not monarchy, it's even worse - it'll be a theocracy. Do we really need another theocracy in the world? Giving Tibet "freedom" means the people of Tibet will be moved from the hands of one autocracy to another. I'd just like to point out that the protesting Tibetans are not the majority - most of them are indifferent. Yes, many of them are unhappy under China's rule, like many people in China, but are they going to be any happier being ruled by someone who thinks he has the divine right to rule?

icyboi5 (August 18, 2008 at 3:14 am)

is this some kind of free tibet party? everything we say it's a spam! did u guys every thinked about wat will happen if tibet is freed? It will become Monarchy and devasted

merdailloux (August 10, 2008 at 11:27 am)

china sucks anyway

theaerain (August 6, 2008 at 9:40 pm)

If Bjork was to govern Tibet, pink fairies would enter people's nose and cum a spoon of milk inside their nose which would then pile up dead bodies in the million and create a green fart over the region.

magnietuit (August 5, 2008 at 3:11 pm)

read this book: The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet, and the Dalai LamaWritten by dr. goldstein, the world known tibet expert, spending almost all his lifetime research on tibet.Amazon sells this book for 15$his research may have all you free-tibet fans shocked

luigisilverio (August 5, 2008 at 10:36 am)

Visit site TIBET . ORG to access free information about occupied TIBET! BOYCOTT CHINA!

rizel6555 (August 4, 2008 at 12:49 pm)

I declare I've officially lost all respect for Bjork. I thought she was a "thinking individual", that doesn't give a fuck what others think, in the past. Now She's just a trend follower, very disappointing. Didn't know Bjork was another superficial hippie that only cared about following trends, without a thinking brain. Tibet is about autonomy, NOT independence.I bet she doesn't know the difference.Bjork needs to get herself some education, instead of just following trends.

rizel6555 (August 4, 2008 at 12:48 pm)

Didn't know Bjork was another superficial hippie that only cared about following trends, without a thinking brain. Tibet is about autonomy, NOT independence.I bet she doesn't know the difference.Bjork needs to get herself some education, instead of just following trends.I declare I've officially lost all respect for Bjork, and I thought she was a thinking individual in the past. She's just a trend follower, very disappointing to find out.

rizel6555 (August 4, 2008 at 12:46 pm)

Didn't know Bjork was another superficial hippie that only cared about following trends, without a thinking brain. Tibet is about autonomy, NOT independence.I bet she doesn't know the difference.Bjork needs to get herself some education, instead of just following trends.I declare I've officially lost all respect for Bjork, and I thought she was a thinking individual in the past. She's just a trend follower, very disappointing.

rizel6555 (August 4, 2008 at 12:46 pm)

Didn't know Bjork was another superficial hippie that only cared about following trends, without a thinking brain. Tibet is about autonomy, NOT independence.I bet she doesn't know the difference.Bjork needs to get herself some education, instead of just following trends.I declare I've officially lost all respect for Bjork, and I thought she was a thinking individual in the past. She's just a trend follower, very disappointing.