G. Edward Griffin- On Individualism v Collectivism #3 of 4
 |
||
PARTI 3 of 4 Interview of G. Edward Griffin on the meaning of individualsim vs. collectivism in the United States. Let's re-learn the true nature of a constitutional republic, our culture and our birthright.Know that any member of the Council of Foreign Relations CFR is prone to supporting COLLECTIVISM not individualism.Vote for Ron Paul for President 08. Our last remaining hope for a solution to socialism, captivity, slavery and sloth.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Autor: anyusmoon1
Duración: 03:46
Puntuación: 4.80
Reproducciones: 3569
Etiquetas: collectivism communism constitution griffin individualism Paul republic Ron ronpaul socialism
Comentarios
|
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Also, please forward these videos to your list and help educate everyone you know on these important topics AND the fact that the Income Tax on ordinary labor of Americans living and working in the U.S. is not legal.
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Indeed! Please check out the other playlist on my channel of an interview G. Edward Griffin did of Norman Dodd- it'll blow you away and help illuminate how, why and who was behind the steep and deliberate descent into stupidity.
Darkchaos1993 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
people arnt thinking anymore, stupid people (majority of people) want all their problems to be taken care of. they give all the power to the government so they dont have to do anything, and just le someone else take care of it. people need to be educated!
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Good leadership is entirely predicated on proven ability to show respect for the true strength of the group lies in the individuals freedom.Good leadership arranges things in such a way where mistakes are buffered and or damage is spread out in such a way so as to harm the least number of individuals.Individuals who responsibly choose a leader also take part in the decision making and thereby disbursing credit and debit in an apportioned manner.
LucVNO (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Groups need leaders to move through existance, qualified or not. Individuals don't. If the leader of a group maks a mistakes everyone suffers. If an individual makes a mistake, only he suffers.
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm no expert on ism's but here's my take... How can the individual strengthening, providing for and generally caring for himself and 'his' ie family, NOT benefit those around him.Conversely if he doesn't care for himself either he passes away or becomes dependent on those around him.A key point here, in my estimation, is not necessarily how we function in our immediate sphere but what we ask federal government to do or not do on our behalf or on behalf of others (Robin Hood). Make sense?
Funkyskunk01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
what id like to know is if both individualism and collectivism follow the philosophy of utilitarianism, in other words th greater good for the greater number?
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hence the catagory political science :-D
rottenvenetic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The old man's a politician not a scientist.
Errol2k (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The cause of every major evil is when people start believing and stop thinking or self-introspecting the ideas they have been led to believe in.
|