First Moon Landing 1969
 |
||
The video of the very first moon landing of the apollo 11 mission in 1969! Neil Armstrong was the first man to set foot on the moon with his now legenday words "One small step for man, a giant leap for mankind." This is a truly amazing video and it was in 1969!!! If you think about it, you have orders of magnitude more processing power in your mobile phone than they did in the whole space craft!! Incredible!
Canal: Howto & Style
Añadido: February 10, 2006 at 4:28 pm
Autor: beanz2u
Duración: 01:44
Puntuación: 4.52
Reproducciones: 1266423
Etiquetas: 11 1969 aldrin apollo armstrong buzz earth first landing moon neil space travel
Comentarios
|
Jackattack20011 (September 6, 2008 at 9:46 pm)
ok cool, thought u were one of the idiots who thinks its real lol
GDragon9666 (September 6, 2008 at 9:44 pm)
that what im saying bud, its obviously fake for so many reasons...like in vacum,there's no air to cary off accumulated heat, air been our conducter to do this with our own bodies, so the appolo rockets would have been like an oven from the sun's heat,their explaination is that it was rotating so that the unexposed side cooled off, not in vacuum it wont!!!...tank you! im saying the tks part cause im feeling funny today, not as an insult and that were only stating the obvious! cheers!
stillablaze (September 6, 2008 at 9:43 pm)
LunarTuner the SAA are not as intense as you suggest they are low energy and flux density.The energy is low energy 10Mev as opposed to 100Mev for the inner VAB's. The flux density in the SAA is 3,000 particles\cm squared. In the inner VAB's they are 20,000 particles\cm squared. This explians why astronauts can fly through the SAA as the intensity is lower.I take it they flew through the VAB's at 40 deg lat in the northern hem at the edges right and solar peak times on a radioactive moon !
stillablaze (September 6, 2008 at 9:27 pm)
"Since Japan is in a race with the US to be the first to return to the moon, "there is no race LunarTuner as NASA have never gone. lol "Frankly, you have absolutely no evidence to back up such a conjecture. "NASA do not have any evidence they have been to the moon either.
stillablaze (September 6, 2008 at 9:10 pm)
mmm...the Japanese just happen to be studyingthe mountain range area were Apollo allegedely landed eh! Nice. I'll try to explain. I do believe there is a mountain range as in the Japanese images shown on the moon. NASA took images way before the moon landings of this area. Re-created the images back in a studio of the same mountain range. Hollywood style. lolThe reason for no images of the equipment because there is none on the moon. So they take 10m res 3D system instead.
stillablaze (September 6, 2008 at 8:42 pm)
"Where in the world did you get that!! "lol I got it from 2 Apolloist ! They were the one's who directed me to the Japanese website saying they now have proof. To go look at the photo's\images and this will prove we landed on the moon. NOT. I mean Echard110 if they (Japanese) have posted 'proof' on their website of course it was an objective thinking CT's and hoaxers would now believe it to be true. You do make me laugh though 'press me on this' oh yea like i'm gonna crack or something. lol
Jackattack20011 (September 6, 2008 at 8:15 pm)
Look it was fake, there is NO air in space, but the us goverment was too stupid to know that so they had a fan on the SET. Thats why its waving. And why is there NO STARS. Thank You!!
GDragon9666 (September 6, 2008 at 8:03 pm)
ooooh...no air...take a good look when they use the rover...the sand been blown is clearly coming in contact with air...without air resistance it should follow a smooth , near perfect arc the to ground...it does not...it ''hits'' ...Air!...thank you! :) lol
GDragon9666 (September 6, 2008 at 8:01 pm)
OOOOOooookay...at about 0:55 you can clearly see something small, rodent like, moving from left to right behind the ''astronaut'' moving forward...who also happens to be ''See trough'' signs of film manipulations...fruits the pre-digital era!...thank you!
Jackattack20011 (September 6, 2008 at 4:53 pm)
but there is no air
|