EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)
 |
||
Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at wtc@nist.govPlease do not visit the following sites for more information about what really happened, as they don't agree with NIST's expert and trustworthy analysis: http://www.ae911truth.org http://www.stj911.com http://www.911blogger.com http://www.corbettreport.comYo... have been warned.
Canal: Education
Añadido: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Autor: corbettreport
Duración: 03:24
Puntuación: 4.83
Reproducciones: 50763
Etiquetas: building collapse demolition expansion explosion fire hazard implosion nist office report science thermal warning wtc7
Comentarios
|
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The math, if I'm right, shows it can be done.But again, I must remember that the fire was on the entire side of the building.For your own interests, I sent you a message with links to a few photos I have. See them if you wish.I mean, the math is there for thermites, but the fires necessary to cause enough damage is seen as well.Of course, the fact that WTC7 burned for 9 hours with more fires than the twin towers begs to question if the fires are to blame on the skyscrapers?
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I now need to know IF I'm right, and the energy put out by thermite.
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well I can tell you.KE = PE = E = MC^2The energy required to melt TONS of steel is very high. 533.15 kelvin is the melting point in general1 ton equals 907.18474 KgFg=MgFg= 8,899.4823 NewtonsPE = NxM1655303.71 JoulesE=MC^2You would need 0.00552149884 KG of thermite, I think. Maybe it could be done, If my math is right
smitty121981 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I can't say for sure HOW it happened, because I am not in a position to accurately investigate such a thing. NIST completely ignored it in their report, so that's no help. But I can say with some certainty that it DID happen. A nuke is a one time event. A chemical reaction can take place over a long period of time, with enough catalytic material present. Are you denying the existence of the molten metal simply on the basis that it doesn't make sense to you?
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No, not that long. No method I can think of can sustain heat that long so as to keep the rate of heat input in equilibrium to the heat export.We're talking hundreds of degrees here, in a calm September day. You'd need a massive amount of heat intake.When a nuke goes off, things are no longer molten in mere hours.This doesn;t make chemical sense.Can you simply explain to me the method YOU think this was done?Thermite is not enough. Chemical energy cannot create such and affect.
smitty121981 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
but the metal DID remain molten that long!You're right, it takes a crapload of energy - on par with the amount of energy required to completely destroy a skyscraper in a matter of seconds... substances like thermite contain their own oxygen and can therefor sustain a reaction under rubble. Research it already!
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Metal cannot remain molten that long. Even the thermos they used in WW2 to destroy artillery only lasted long enough to bend the metal of artillery. It;s not like the artillery melted into a pool of lava.Such things take incredible amounts of energy, and to last that long the energy is borderline low-yield nuclear.
smitty121981 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
there WAS molten metal...so what could damage every column AND produce molten metal long after collapse AND introduce sulfur to the situation? Thermate or some similar substance. Please read Steven Jones' paper titled "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings CompletelyCollapse?" before you respond. Make sure you find the version from September 2006
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
2..."saying the columns fell but there was no damage is an oxymoron." YES!! exactly, so take the next logical step towards demolition!No, then the coulombs would be ever more damaged. I don't think they were undamaged. There was nothing but scraps left, It's physically impossible that they were undamaged.
Gormanmod (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As I said it looks like a free fall from that angle.Sulfer can come from anything. The USE produces the most sulfuric acid than anyone else, and it's in everything from pictures to seats to food preservers and water treatments. Preasur is with reguards to some damages seen.And I am sorry, but the LAWS of thermodynamics do not physically allow the presence of molten items on the surface of the Earth unless there is a volcano some similar natural heater under. it.
|