G. Edward Griffin- On Individualism v Collectivism #4
 |
||
PARTI 4 of 4 Interview of G. Edward Griffin on the meaning of individualsim vs. collectivism in the United States. Let's re-learn the true nature of a constitutional republic, our culture and our birthright.Know that any member of the Council of Foreign Relations CFR is prone to supporting COLLECTIVISM not individualism.Vote for Ron Paul for President 08. Our last remaining hope for a solution to socialism, captivity, slavery and sloth.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Autor: anyusmoon1
Duración: 06:17
Puntuación: 4.92
Reproducciones: 3909
Etiquetas: collectivism communism constitution griffin individualism Paul republic Ron ronpaul socialism
Comentarios
|
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
good reply
eotto2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
For Darkchaos1993, the elections were rigged through either voter suppression, activist judges on the supreme court,and to a certain point complicity on the part of the Democrats in 2000 and 2004 not to challenge the elections. There was a failure from 2000 by any party to seek to correct the problem. Computer voting was not the answer. Is it explained enough?
eotto2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
For Darkchaos1993, the elections were rigged through either voter suppression, activist judges on the supreme court,and to a certain point complicity on the part of the Democrats in 2000 and 2004 not to challenge the elections. There was a failure from 2000 by any party to seek to correct the problem. Computer voting was not the answer. Then there was Carl Rove. Is it explained enough?
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm not being flippant here but... there are few 'We The People' people that have any bearing on a presidential election. Even those that voted for him didn't really have a lot to do with him getting elected.The bigger question is... Bush and Kerry were nearly indistinguishable from one another and the same goes 4 McLame / OweBama. Until we return this country 2 Constitutional Republic principles, limited federal gov, sound monetary and non-interventionist foreign policies it doesn't matter.
Darkchaos1993 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
can someone explain to me how bush was elected twice as president? (everyone is like "booo bush sucks!" and yet most of them were the ones that voted for him)i dont really know that much, but i could use an answer
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Those who hunger for power and become greedy with it MAY cause harm to the public and if they do they can be stopped- Again, only by We The People. You can not continue to look for solutions from government, the very scoundrels you talk about.
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
History my friend, if you dare to watch the other fascinating interview BY G. Edward Griffin OF a gentleman by the name of Norman Dodds, has been stolen from you- re-written by those who want to reinstruct on the matter of sovereignty, power of the individual and the rights to flourish or perish.Watch that video series then comment on history.
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well here it is... the blame falls entirely on American individuals for allowing the usurpation, the responsibility-ditchers, the the envious impoverished of those who have more, or different items, lifestyles or perhaps education then they.The blame goes to We The People. And it is We the People that will restore sovereignty and all the pains in our asses that sovereignty means. The country was founded on a government issued powers by and for the people. PERIOD.
anyusmoon1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You claim to be ready to accept truth, aka zero-bullshit, right?
ChupacabraYetiElmo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The bullshitters like to say who did this and that. I would ask, was the cold war won by Reagan and his policies? Not according to this speaker and his Leninism vs Fabianism lecture. It seems even the Leninists have postponed or delayed and tried a new strategy and become the fabianists vs the other fabianists. NWO according to who?
|