Congressman Ron Paul Responds to the 700B Bailout
Congressman Ron Paul Responds to the $700 Billion bailout immediatly after it was signed into law.
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Autor: fantasyfootballgod
Duración: 03:07
Puntuación: 4.99
Reproducciones: 22215
Etiquetas: $700 bailout bill billion Congress Department historic Paul Ron Street Treasury Wall WASHINGTON
Comentarios
|
ipoopedalittle (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
how ron paul could actually stay in congress for twenty years surrounded by all of the blatant corruptness and continue to be the absolute most consistent voter during his tenure is beyond me. he deserves a lot of respect and is one of the very few poloticians who i listen to and am convinced that he has the well being of this nation and its citzens at heart. he never spins and answers immediately in any interview. i hope he sticks around because we need this guy badly. God bless us all.
LibertyInDeath (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
zeitgeistmovie. com for all of those who wish to know whats really going on.
rocksiphone (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Watch this video called: The federal reserve caused the 700 billion dollar bailout and economic crash Help your Country - Please SPREAD THIS VIDEO AROUNDGET A LIST OF THOSE WHO VOTED FOR THE BAILOUT AND VOTE THEM OUT!
aryanpowers88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
To those that think Ron Paul wants it all to come down and watch America Burn, This is NOT true at all. The way I look at it, he's a doctor. He is saying we have a tumour in our system. We can get the tumour out now and stay sick in bed for a little while and recover or we can keeping medicating it and stay on our feet a little longer until it's cancerous and too late!
lizardfirefighter110 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ZenithPlacidity, I don't think you have the whole story. See Elliot Spitzer's letter printed in the Washington Post 2/14/08.On a different subject, check out the following and then tell me what the fuck is going on! Army Regulation 210-35, and H.R. 1955. Those that give up their liberties for security will end up with neither --- Ben Franklin.
ZenithPlacidity (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i don't think banks need to be regulated to not give out loans to risky borrowers.Banks were forced, by provisions and/or laws, to increase the amount of loans they would give out to risky (low credit score) borrowers. This was done by liberals in order to stimulate "home ownership."This is what has been called, "the tyranny of good intentions." The biggest straw man comes when people try to pretend like we've been in a free market this whole time and we need more regulation. Douchébags.
swixican (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this man saved the GOP in the long term... GIVE HIM POWER
hatchls1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If you understood what was going on you would realize that everyday we prolong this problem with bailouts and credit extensions the worse we are making the inevitable.
Alexvamp321 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
!! I LOVE GETTING on the CAM!! msn!!! msg me jane23belle
Nigralurker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No, you want to see the money go right to the corrupt wall street rich pigs. Why should we, the people have to bailout these rich pigs in wallstreet? This is socialism for the rich. Nothing more.
|