Breedo (October 14, 2008 at 4:22 am)

But they still look unrealistic. If you want a movie with more feeling it wont work with something that looks almost like a freaking duck, why'd you think the new star wars movies sucked so hard?

cobraC510 (October 13, 2008 at 10:06 pm)

Who the voice of the "PLANT" ....any 1 know ???? kinda Rick jamesish

auroraborealis990 (October 13, 2008 at 7:10 pm)

The old ones are the best :) I think the authentic, less 'smooth' appearance of films look far better than the modern films which are, like you said, cheap and easy to make. No remakes!x

GalacticChicken (October 13, 2008 at 2:11 pm)

cheaper and faster, but looks way worse. No matter how good the technology is, it will never give the same feeling as Audrey II in this movie did, it was really IN the room, it was really there. I know people that see the movie and think this is the greatest CGI work ever, and when I tell them that it's basically just a big puppet it's like "Get out!"And English is far from being my mother tongue. Bottom line, this don't need a remake! Develop more stage shows to film instead!

BinaryReader (October 13, 2008 at 10:58 am)

but, computer animated graphics are cheaper and faster to produce. And its soul, not soal.

MurdocFox (October 12, 2008 at 8:39 pm)

i <3 nerds

fillfullfoulapendure (October 12, 2008 at 7:03 pm)

looks so much better than CGI

GalacticChicken (October 12, 2008 at 5:40 pm)

agreed 2trynnot ^^ What stupid ideas... I mean gee, most the actors are still alive and not even super old looking! o_Ó Films today don't have much soal, and everything would be computer animated...

2trynnot (October 12, 2008 at 1:08 am)

this movie was an original. it should never be remade.... EVER!!!

obiwanobiwan13 (October 11, 2008 at 6:19 pm)

But who to cast for what.........Seymour's a hard choice, but if Jimmy Falon, from "Fever Pitch" can sing, he'd be a good choice. The others I don't quite know.......Ideas?