BBC Reported Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE
 |
||
Visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth: http://www.ae911truth.org/Then... go to http://www.911truth.org and support the Truth cause by signing the other 9/11-related petitions--located along the right-hand side of the page--calling for a new, independent investigation among other things. Help demand the truth. Remember, "the government derives its power from the people, not the other way around."Part I: BBC World reports the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) while it is clearly still standing outside the window behind the reporter (tall building on the right). They also give a time reference that is 23 minutes before the actual collapse. As the reporter keeps talking to the studio anchor and the time approaches the actual collapse, her feed cuts out to the BBC studio (approx. 5 minutes before). Part II: In the BBC's explanation for their 23 minute advance warning of the Salomon Brothers Building (7 WT) collapse, they said that they cannot make any determinations regarding the broadcast because they have "lost" the footage. They went on to specifically mention BBC News 24 as the only remaining footage, but said that it did not clear matters up either way.This is the BBC News 24 clip--notice the time stamp. A quick check of World Time Zone shows that the time shown: 21.54 on September 11, 2001 is British Summer Time, which is exactly 5 hours later than Eastern Time (NY). The time stamp reveals that this was being broadcast at 9:54 pm in the UK--4:54 pm in New York. The official time of collapse for the Salomon Brothers Building was 5:20 pm. In trying to explain the BBC World advance notice of collapse (23 min.), they inexplicably led people to the News 24 footage which reported the collapse 26 min. in advance of the actual collapse. Now given that BBC World, BBC News 24, and CNN all reported the collapse well ahead of time, the question is: Who fed them the information ahead of time?Also see footage of CNN predicting collapse close to an hour early: http://www.informationliberati... collapses of steel-framed buildings: http://skeptosis.blogspot.com/...
Canal: News & Politics
Añadido: March 1, 2007 at 5:28 am
Autor: quartermick
Duración: 09:25
Puntuación: 4.65
Reproducciones: 178540
Etiquetas: 11 2001 24 9-11 9/11 BBC Center Collapse News September Terror Trade World
Comentarios
|
brian78045 (August 19, 2008 at 3:39 pm)
There are some interesting articles on the World Trade Center buildings and their collapses at DNotice (org). The articles are titled, "Not So Deep Impact" and "If You Can't Take The Heat, Get Out Of The Kitchen".
antd2008 (August 19, 2008 at 12:30 pm)
the 9/11 building 7 1 is the only conspiracy theory i believe
Swede7777 (August 19, 2008 at 4:57 am)
you guys do know that that is a green screen right?...
911insidejob9116 (August 18, 2008 at 7:05 pm)
wtc7 collapsed in 11.september at 5:20 pm. It looked like controlled demolition!And it was!!!!If it was controlled demolition than they knew about 9/11 before it took place.It takes days to plan and prepare for controlled demolition. ( not 8 hours)
Domel003 (August 18, 2008 at 6:27 pm)
could someone public this with polish subtitles?
thearcangel11 (August 18, 2008 at 1:52 am)
Think back to all the alternate theories they were tossing out at that point. People were beginning to demand ANSWERS to what they'd seen. Witnesses from inside the towers reported explosions, so they tossed out the "exploding restaurant theory", then the jet-fuel down the elevator shaft theory, on and on. This was simply Silverstein trying to provide an answer as to why 7 fell without really committing to AN ANSWER. He was purposely vague, yet not vague. NO collapses occur at free-fall speed.
thearcangel11 (August 18, 2008 at 1:32 am)
Chris, show me ONE image of this tilting and bulging. The fires were minimal and didn't begin until late in the afternoon. The damage to the building was mostly superficial to an outer wall. It was the least damaged of them all really, yet it fell, fell PERFECTLY I might add. Watch the video of it falling and you see the charges down the front. Collapses are uneven, something drops, catches on something else, drops a little more, etc. that is not what #7 did. This is free-fall.
ChrisJ4567 (August 18, 2008 at 1:16 am)
please provide proof that this countdown took place.Firemen were in there earlier, as many have described hearing noises such as "creaking and groaning."Again, they told everyone to stay away because it had a 20 story hole scooped out of the south side, it was tilting, bulging, and they heard "groaning" noises coming from inside. Since two other buildings just collapsed, they wouldnt be shocked to see anotherSilverstein couldnt have ordered anyone to demolish a building let alone a fire chief
thearcangel11 (August 18, 2008 at 1:10 am)
Chris, there was no need to "pull the firemen out" as the news footage and reports clearly show that the firemen avoided going anywhere NEAR the building all day, saying "Stay away, that bldg. is going to be coming down," as if warned. How do you explain the firemen that heard a countdown coming over the radio just prior to it falling? Anyone with a brain can look at the footage of 7 coming down and see the charges going down the front of the bldg. Silverstein was back-pedaling after the fact.
ChrisJ4567 (August 17, 2008 at 3:42 pm)
You're right. That they would pull off this massive, brilliantly executed plan, and then just let it slip on tv. The blowjobbers are incapable a criticizing their own crackpot theories.
|